
gif credit to greenerlester

Daaaamn that would explain the internet thing?LtrllySusan wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:53 am So what if... there are two flats. And they usually just film down there, take the SD card up to the bigger phlat, edit and upload from there. The WiFi kinda reaches to the phake phlat, but it's kinda crap. Therefore, bad internet in the gaming room. When they realised that for the gaming streams they made it a bigger story line (bad internet provider) while they could get internet set up in the other place.
Or they just have shit internet in general? I just still can't believe a Youtuber would have a 0.25 Mbts upload :eh:
Oh wow thanks, great attitude from a former mod
Quoting this from the previous thread because I'm in the same situation here, in that I understood his previous controversy as a bad joke & not something you'd necessarily have to cut ties with a person for. But this new situation has opened my eyes and while I doubt dan&phil would ever say anything about it, because they've almost never adressed problematic behavior in the past, I hope they at least stop associating with him publicly. I know it's hard to "unfriend" someone irl, especially when you have mutual friends (plus they're like the least confrontational people on Youtube I know about), I'm only hoping for no more positive liveshow mentions or tweets.blackdenim wrote: Pewdiepie drama
Last time this came up I was one of the minority that thought Felix was just making a bad joke and trying to be edgy, and didn't see why D&P would want to/have to stop being friends with him. This feels different to me though. If one of my friends used that word so casually, there is no way I would believe they weren't racist, and I don't think I'd be able to keep being friends with them as a result. I hope Dan and Phil feel the same way about Felix now but I appreciate it's not as black and white as that when you're friends with someone. And again this goes back to the rolemodel thing. Do they have to stop being friends with someone for the sake of looking good to their audience? No. Do I hope that they feel morally that they can't be friends with him anymore? Yes.
I can totally see where you are coming from, and the logical part of me fully agrees. Yet - it's fun to play detective, and I am excited to read what other people have deducted, and I do take part in the discussion and throw odd ideas into the room. But I can also understand why it's creepy and troublesome.Just in keeping with the theme of it being unpopular opinion day, and with the hope that other, and more subjectively interesting, discussion topics pop up in the days to come (bring on voluntary vacation selfies pls/thx and/or call out pewdiepie pls/thx), I just want to say I find the mapping out of Barbie's dream house immensely creepy. I'm not telling or expecting anybody to stop doing it, because lol yeah right, but i just feel like saying not everybody is into it (and if 'not everybody' really just means 'me', oh well). "Good wholesome fun" I guess in the sense that maybe/arguably nobody is being obviously harmed by it but while IDB likes to wear its sherlocking/'wholesome-stalking' like some kind of badge, it's probably my least favourite part about this place. I'd rather read more arguments about queerbaiting tbh. And nobody needs to care about that opinion on any level, but if there are any lurkers out there thinking 'wow what a creepy stalker haven': yeah. But as has been well-documented even just today, it's not a homogenous group of people on the exact same wavelength.
Just throwing that out there.
Lol it was a joke, apologies if that wasn't clear. I just meant that this thread generally goes indepth all the time (thus indepth bants), it's kinda how the site rocks haha. What does being a former mod have to do with anything anyway?
I've been thinking about this as well. It's easy to say 'oh he doesn't have agoraphobia because he still goes outside', but I think it shouldn't be underestimated how stressful it is to just want to go somewhere and constantly be on edge, to constantly think about whether there's a fan nearby, whether people are taking pictures of you, whether people are going to come up to you (whether you like that or not).LtrllySusan wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:34 am Quoting fancybum from the other thread:
I can totally see where you are coming from, and the logical part of me fully agrees. Yet - it's fun to play detective, and I am excited to read what other people have deducted, and I do take part in the discussion and throw odd ideas into the room. But I can also understand why it's creepy and troublesome.Just in keeping with the theme of it being unpopular opinion day, and with the hope that other, and more subjectively interesting, discussion topics pop up in the days to come (bring on voluntary vacation selfies pls/thx and/or call out pewdiepie pls/thx), I just want to say I find the mapping out of Barbie's dream house immensely creepy. I'm not telling or expecting anybody to stop doing it, because lol yeah right, but i just feel like saying not everybody is into it (and if 'not everybody' really just means 'me', oh well). "Good wholesome fun" I guess in the sense that maybe/arguably nobody is being obviously harmed by it but while IDB likes to wear its sherlocking/'wholesome-stalking' like some kind of badge, it's probably my least favourite part about this place. I'd rather read more arguments about queerbaiting tbh. And nobody needs to care about that opinion on any level, but if there are any lurkers out there thinking 'wow what a creepy stalker haven': yeah. But as has been well-documented even just today, it's not a homogenous group of people on the exact same wavelength.
Just throwing that out there.
Since Dan's agoraphobia comment I have been thinking what we can do to help. I didn't bring it up cause there was this whole discussion about the phobia mention being valid or not, but it fits in in the light of your comment.
I take things way too personal generally, so I am just wondering what my behaviour has done to support this development of mental health issues. So I was thinking, maybe I should bring it up to IDB, that we can all be a bit less invasive? But then I thought no, they are probably gonna find that silly and they aren't doing anything illegal so who am I to tell them.
Overanalysing D&P's communication with us (videos, LSs, tweets) has basically become a sport here. I know for a lot of people it's all in good fun and with a wink and nothing's too serious, but we gotta remember there's a lot of lurkers on here (not meaning you, lurker). One time I wrote how a tweet from Dan that had blacked out text was still quite readable, and I immediately got two PMs from people who've never posted, asking about details.
My (rambly) point is - with all our fun analysis, are we enabling worse behaviour?
And - is it worth it? Is the satisfaction of finding out information we weren't given large enough to make up for possible discomfort of D&P, to the point where it might be influencing mental health? (it's an assumption of course, but I very much doubt Dan's "growing agoraphobia" has absolutely nothing to do with his fame and desire for privacy)
Who says they're accepting it? They haven't commented the issue at all and that isn't the same as accepting his behaviour. They mentioned him on stream BEFORE he made that racist comment. Pretty sure if he had made the comment before their live stream, they would have never mentioned him (and Marzia).Katka wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:07 am It just doesn’t make sense to me how especially Dan is quite vocal about social justice stuff lately and still chooses to affiliate himself with Felix. It doesn’t make sense. If you’re anti-racism, anti-homophobia etc., how can you just accept a friend publicly being a racist twat? I think it’s all about how powerful Felix is in the Youtube world and nobody seems to want to be on his bad side. He reminds me a bit of a school bully: Everyone tries to be friends with the popular boy even though his behaviour is horrible just so he doesn’t turn on them. Felix even sent his fanboys after J.K. Rowling. She was having none of it but I doubt fellow Youtubers want that kind of attention from his fanbase. Seriously, I just can’t see why deppy would genuinely want to be friends with someone like Felix. Unless of course the image I have of them is all wrong but I really hope that’s not the case. I don't expect them to speak up about it but they seriously need to stop mentioning Felix at all. The "We played this game with Felix and Marzia before" comment in the last gaming stream was all kinds of unnecessary and all it does is make it seem like they still support Felix and that's just sad.
I understand what you're saying, but my problem is with the way Dan does that. his twitter is definitely not his personal account anymore, he uses it mostly for business purposes and to communicate with his fanbase, and like he himself said, he doesn't use it to express personal opinions that much because he has a huge following, so he's fully aware that the things he tweets can have an influence on his fans and he's aware that everything he does on his public social media can have consequences. so I personally think that it's possible for Dan to find a different approach when it comes to his coping mechanisms, for example, are tweets like these really necessary on his public account?MaggieW wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:25 amAlso, about the jokes being harmful... maybe they influence younger people to joke on things that they don't have. But I think in this case it's more important that Dan can have a coping mechanism that might help him with his problems. Yes, joking about suicide and stuff it's not good, but at least people are talking about it and that might be helpful for others to be more open about their issues, if they want to. At least that's how I see it.
Just wanted to say I agree with this! I think speculation about houseplans is fine as long as we're using info deppy themselves have shown us.Vanderlyle wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:01 pm RE: floor plan
idk - it's strange to me that discussions of their apartment would be more invasive than discussions of the nature/ intimacies of their relationship... or their mental health. i would much rather people speculate about my home than my personal flaws/ relationships.
as Katka said, it isn't done out of the spirit of stalking. from my understanding, there is absolutely zero intent of locating their apartment, but for the purpose of understanding them in "space". like- i moved far away for grad school and my mom visited and wanted to see my school and class rooms so she could imagine me in my daily life/ understand my day better. i feel like the apartment speculation comes from a place of endearment. plus, i believe many of us grew up watching home improvement/ interior design shows. as someone in my mid-twenties, that's the kind of content i crave ha![]()
just adding my two cents - obviously, everyone has their own moral barometer and that is ok - there are more defined lines that should not be crossed - other than that, to each their own, basically![]()
I personally believe Phil when he said that when they were looking at the place they were told the internet would be great, with fiber optic cable. But then when they moved in it wasn't there, and couldn't be installed in that building. So they went with a different plan and found it didn't work well for streaming, not just in the gaming room, but it seems downstairs in general. That is probably why they both do their liveshows upstairs (that or they just really prefer the lighting/ aesthetic up there), when during the first liveshow (yes I rewatched it recently) they were planning on showing the upstairs only through pics on Instagram and Twitter.LtrllySusan wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:53 am So what if... there are two flats. And they usually just film down there, take the SD card up to the bigger phlat, edit and upload from there. The WiFi kinda reaches to the phake phlat, but it's kinda crap. Therefore, bad internet in the gaming room. When they realised that for the gaming streams they made it a bigger story line (bad internet provider) while they could get internet set up in the other place.
Or they just have shit internet in general? I just still can't believe a Youtuber would have a 0.25 Mbts upload :eh:
I totally understand why you are upset, and it's totally ok to feel that way!goingbackto505 wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:15 pm I understand what you're saying, but my problem is with the way Dan does that. his twitter is definitely not his personal account anymore, he uses it mostly for business purposes and to communicate with his fanbase, and like he himself said, he doesn't use it to express personal opinions that much because he has a huge following, so he's fully aware that the things he tweets can have an influence on his fans and he's aware that everything he does on his public social media can have consequences. so I personally think that it's possible for Dan to find a different approach when it comes to his coping mechanisms, for example, are tweets like these really necessary on his public account?I think it wouldn't hurt him to at least tone it down a bit. but I understand that everyone has a different opinion about Dan's "inevergooutsidelol" jokes, and that's totally fine, opinions are opinions. Dan will keep doing what he wants anyway, and he's definitely not the most problematic person ever by any means, so he definitely shouldn't be attacked for his jokes, albeit they can be upsetting for many people, including me.
Yeah I think no more liveshow mentions or tweets are the best we can hope for re: PDP. As you say, they're not confrontational and 'addressing drama' isn't really how they roll. As you say, they have mutual friends with him that I'm sure they'll continue to want to be friends with, so they can't publicly (or even privately, really) denounce him. But I hope they don't do anything that could be seen as endorsing/normalising his behaviour at least.chiccola wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:04 amQuoting this from the previous thread because I'm in the same situation here, in that I understood his previous controversy as a bad joke & not something you'd necessarily have to cut ties with a person for. But this new situation has opened my eyes and while I doubt dan&phil would ever say anything about it, because they've almost never adressed problematic behavior in the past, I hope they at least stop associating with him publicly. I know it's hard to "unfriend" someone irl, especially when you have mutual friends (plus they're like the least confrontational people on Youtube I know about), I'm only hoping for no more positive liveshow mentions or tweets.blackdenim wrote: Pewdiepie drama
Last time this came up I was one of the minority that thought Felix was just making a bad joke and trying to be edgy, and didn't see why D&P would want to/have to stop being friends with him. This feels different to me though. If one of my friends used that word so casually, there is no way I would believe they weren't racist, and I don't think I'd be able to keep being friends with them as a result. I hope Dan and Phil feel the same way about Felix now but I appreciate it's not as black and white as that when you're friends with someone. And again this goes back to the rolemodel thing. Do they have to stop being friends with someone for the sake of looking good to their audience? No. Do I hope that they feel morally that they can't be friends with him anymore? Yes.