(I could never, tbh)
).
They do so few series though, they're nothing like most gaming channels in that respect so we'll just have to count on Phil trying to jumpscare Dan for the sake of it when Halloween is long gone 
I have pretty much the same concerns. On one hand, I'm super excited, on the other I'm slightly worried that this element of challenge will take something away from the usual greatness of baking videos. I trust them to make it at least very funny though.rizzo wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:45 am NGL, I'm pretty pumped for the likely baking-in-one-sweater video. But I'm mildly concerned also? It's really a stupid thing, but I think baking has always been pretty good on its own. Adding a handicap makes that handicap the star of the show. Instead of the jokes and bants coming from their general chemistry, it'll be all about problems with the sweater.
To clarify, I'm no less excited, because I'm all here for anything that'll force them into each other's personal bubbles for a full video. Sign me up. Just... I don't want this to besmirch the tradition of The Baking Video™.
So, here's how I'm rationalizing it... This'll just be another fun random video idea, leaving room for a regular festive baking. Eh? Eh?!
I didn't think this was evidence/sounded suspect at all when I watched the video! It sounded to me as though the 'our' was him and Phil, but in the context of them both being the character. So if he had been playing alone he would have said 'this must be my room' but because they were playing together it became 'this must be our room'.Stakhanov wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:10 amThe real finale:VengefulBlue wrote: Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:30 pm????context????
(i'm also waiting for times bc i am a scaredy cat, but what????)got brutally murdered in this episode.
As a non-phannie, I did notice that directly and did freak out a little. It does sound suspect, because the only way that "our room" makes sense if he self-identifies at the spot with the male character at the time and his wife...
which is probably just what explains it, but it does feel out of tone. Half a minute before that, Dan was joking about how he liked to go slow to enjoy the aesthetic of the game "as a player". Plus phil just got Danny by pointing out the unintentional "aTIEre" pun he made. So to switch from that in an instant to the perspective of the dad. Noticeable :mrgreen:
But if you kind of look at it in a more detached way there's really no strong case here to suggest he must be signalling their relationship. I feel this is the same as with a lot of the phan "evidence". Just speculation and reading a lot into certain cues and situations you don't have enough context and facts about to verify.
It's certainly cute though
Language is fascinating and I could definitely write a long paragraph about meaning and inferred meaning and subtext and how people can interpret the same words in vastly different ways but I'm at work so I won'tStakhanov wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:49 am blackdenim That does make a lot of sense. I hadn't even thought about that interpretation. I often see so much excitement when they use the word "our" or even when they don't use it but it's assumed that they are talking about what must be their shared future plans (dog, or house or room) that I cast this through a similar net. But yes our can mean everything or nothing at all here,
language is tricky like that. Every time they say "our" it's hard to determine what that implies, and even harder to know if they mean what they say.
I will say that I often interpret the things D&P say in a different way to other people in the Phandom though so it'd be interesting to see how others weigh in on 'our' bedroom. I think 'our' and 'we' in the context of their future plans is much more loaded and interesting than this though. And I also don't think that D&P are particularly careful with their language either (anymore, at least) and might sometimes make offhand comments that really don't mean anything but which we analyse to death - but that's part of the fun of being in a fandom!
Nah. "Eyebleach" is literally a term meaning something cute/nice to relax a person after seeing something bad, I think it's used on reddit a lot, and probably elsewhere. That person saying it's because of Phil's paleness is reaching and you don't need that kind of negativity in your life.rainydays wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:45 am Dan saying Phil is the eyebleach was too cute and I thought the only interpretation was that Phil is just as adorable as kittens, but then someone suggested that what Dan meant is that Phil is too pale and white. Idk.. I'm gonna go with the first option just because I can.
Wait, how long ago was that "eleven days" thing? Still curious what they'll come up with for entertainment reasons. Also I'm still fascinated by the amount of people who really believe Dan would make some weird anonymous Twitter acount to go off on the phandom. I'm pretty sure there are things he's not happy with but he's 26 years old and a professional Youtuber, if he truly wanted to criticise the phandom for some of their shit I'm sure he'd find a better way to do it.liola wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:16 pm So I don't know if any of you actually care but I've been kkeeping up with the drama on Twitter about those accounts making prediction and pretending they have inside info. The most recent one is actually pretending to be Dan with a secret account, tweeting all sorts of things and tbh being kinda rude to the people tweeting. I'm not sure if I'm more concerned about the people behind the account or the people tweeting them believing it's actually Dan having a fandom breakdown. They're saying it's like the customerservice blog of 2012, saying Phil isn't happy with the account etc
It's kinda entertaining lol (they also lurk here, they posted screenshots of some of our posts)
I don't know what it is about horror games that gets me because I never have problems with horror films. I'm really excited for Halloween baking though.Preach. I love living in a time where it’s a reach to think Dan was referring to Phil as a pale bottle of Clorox instead of an adorable kitten. Also, furries.000dia000 wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:23 pmNah. "Eyebleach" is literally a term meaning something cute/nice to relax a person after seeing something bad, I think it's used on reddit a lot, and probably elsewhere. That person saying it's because of Phil's paleness is reaching and you don't need that kind of negativity in your life.rainydays wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:45 am Dan saying Phil is the eyebleach was too cute and I thought the only interpretation was that Phil is just as adorable as kittens, but then someone suggested that what Dan meant is that Phil is too pale and white. Idk.. I'm gonna go with the first option just because I can.
The 11 days thing is supposed to be on November 4th, but The account that tweet ed that is currently silent. This their one instead is really tweeting and asking questions as if it's Dan, saying that "phan was once real but then it didn't work" and that the phandom is bad bc of the shippers lolKatka wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:26 pmWait, how long ago was that "eleven days" thing? Still curious what they'll come up with for entertainment reasons. Also I'm still fascinated by the amount of people who really believe Dan would make some weird anonymous Twitter acount to go off on the phandom. I'm pretty sure there are things he's not happy with but he's 26 years old and a professional Youtuber, if he truly wanted to criticise the phandom for some of their shit I'm sure he'd find a better way to do it.liola wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:16 pm So I don't know if any of you actually care but I've been kkeeping up with the drama on Twitter about those accounts making prediction and pretending they have inside info. The most recent one is actually pretending to be Dan with a secret account, tweeting all sorts of things and tbh being kinda rude to the people tweeting. I'm not sure if I'm more concerned about the people behind the account or the people tweeting them believing it's actually Dan having a fandom breakdown. They're saying it's like the customerservice blog of 2012, saying Phil isn't happy with the account etc
It's kinda entertaining lol (they also lurk here, they posted screenshots of some of our posts)
Spooky week was amazing but I'll be honest, I'm too scared to watch the stream and the last video.
I mentioned this earlier, but I'm really sticking to it and agreeing with you. I think there'll be something extra this spooky week and idk what it is. The timing of the whole thing has been weird and they've definitely been way too open about all things baking, making it a given. (Historically, that was the surprise in 2015 & 2016.)alittledizzy wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:18 pm And fuck Dan, I'm gonna be refreshing his twitter all day long to see if the baking video drops today and I have a gut feeling that if they really just planned a day off that it won't come until tomorrow. Unless this really was a bluff and they have something new that they didn't tell us about planned for actual Halloween, and that's why they're being so strangely open about the baking video plot twist.
I'm excited too, their baking vids are among the vids I most enjoy. I don't really know. Maybe they couldn't find a recipe. I remember dan saying in his live show that he wasn't sure about baking this year until he came across a recipe that he really liked. On a similar note is there never going to be a day in the life this year. There has at least been one since 2012. There have been so many opportunities for one as well. I'm sort of hoping that the reason we haven't gotten one is because they are going to make "a year in our lives" where they show bits of Singapore, of them moving, in Spain, maybe even Isle of Man, etc.garlic wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:41 pm In order to celebrate the upcoming baking video I just rewatched all of their previous baking vids in chronological order and so I wondered..does anybody know why there wasn't a baking video in 2013? Starting with the pancake vid in 2011 they did at least 1 baking video each year except 2013. Was there a known reason for this?
(sorry for my bad grammar)
Thanks for the reply! A "a year in our lives" video would be great but I'm afraid it will not happen. BUT didn't Phil say in a liveshow that they are going to film the making of this years calendar? So we will get a mini ditl sometime this year, better than nothing, eh?hello9217 wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:50 pmI don't really know. Maybe they couldn't find a recipe. I remember dan saying in his live show that he wasn't sure about baking this year until he came across a recipe that he really liked. On a similar note is there never going to be a day in the life this year. There has at least been one since 2012. There have been so many opportunities for one as well. I'm sort of hoping that the reason we haven't gotten one is because they are going to make "a year in our lives" where they show bits of Singapore, of them moving, in Spain, maybe even Isle of Man, etc.garlic wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:41 pm In order to celebrate the upcoming baking video I just rewatched all of their previous baking vids in chronological order and so I wondered..does anybody know why there wasn't a baking video in 2013? Starting with the pancake vid in 2011 they did at least 1 baking video each year except 2013. Was there a known reason for this?
(sorry for my bad grammar)
nooooo stop raising my expectations like this. Now I'm just going to be disappointed with whatever it is they decide to (not) dorizzo wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:16 pm I'm not saying a want a ditl where D&P go to a haunted house, but I want a ditl where D&P go to a haunted house.
