Dan & Phil part 27: Let's Go Home

Our two favourite full time internet nerds who never go outside!
Locked
tracyzz
smol bean
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:43 am

papierklemmen wrote:oqua,
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
How close is her relationship with deppy? We know she just met dan at that point so unless shes close to phil or talked to dan more after that encounter im not sure what lead her to make such a confident conclusion. I do wonder.

I dont believe she is lying. Like you said, i cant think of any reason she would other than if deppy told her to which i dont think so. It might be false, but she certainly believes shes telling the truth.

Edit: this post does not deserve to be on top of a new page why
dans left hand
pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 6:44 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: London, UK

tracyzz wrote:
papierklemmen wrote:oqua,
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
How close is her relationship with deppy? We know she just met dan at that point so unless shes close to phil or talked to dan more after that encounter im not sure what lead her to make such a confident conclusion. I do wonder.

I dont believe she is lying. Like you said, i cant think of any reason she would other than if deppy told her to which i dont think so. It might be false, but she certainly believes shes telling the truth.
Why would she know? She was literally just Charlie's girlfriend. Dan wouldn't have told some girl he isn't even close too. He wasn't even that close with Charlie at any point. Just knew him but not close.
User avatar
papierklemmen
flower crown
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am

dans left hand wrote:
tracyzz wrote:
papierklemmen wrote:oqua,
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
How close is her relationship with deppy? We know she just met dan at that point so unless shes close to phil or talked to dan more after that encounter im not sure what lead her to make such a confident conclusion. I do wonder.

I dont believe she is lying. Like you said, i cant think of any reason she would other than if deppy told her to which i dont think so. It might be false, but she certainly believes shes telling the truth.
Why would she know? She was literally just Charlie's girlfriend. Dan wouldn't have told some girl he isn't even close too. He wasn't even that close with Charlie at any point. Just knew him but not close.
it might be that she knew someone else who told her, or that she saw him or phil with someone else (quite likely). we do know there's frisky stuff happening at youtube parties (including "class A drugs" according to that dude whose name i don't remember :lol:)
nephilimcat
woodland creature
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:52 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: Germany

papierklemmen wrote: a dose of some "anti", as we've been called :sideeye:, past question, under the cut for safety
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
I haven't watched the video because what I'm thinking is: What makes her think she can just say stuff about Dan and Phil's relationship? When I see videos like this, I never click on them because I'm pretty sure they're all just to get attention and I don't want to hear the opinions and experiences of people who are disrespectful. Why else would she mention it? It's not her place to talk about it. Real friends wouldn't say anything about Phan and everyone else has not enough insight to know the truth. If they are a thing, they only told a very small amount of people they really trust. Don't you think someone would have said something undeniable already if they told more people? Or if there was actual evidence of them hooking up with someone else? But there isn't enough "proof" on either side for outsiders to know anything. Maybe that person thinks she's right or whatever, but that doesn't mean anything. And btw, same goes for videos like that that "confirm" Phan, I'm not just saying this because I ship them!
pulvis et umbra sumus
User avatar
lishachi
eclipse shirt
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:08 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: England

nephilimcat wrote:
papierklemmen wrote: a dose of some "anti", as we've been called :sideeye:, past question, under the cut for safety
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
I haven't watched the video because what I'm thinking is: What makes her think she can just say stuff about Dan and Phil's relationship? When I see videos like this, I never click on them because I'm pretty sure they're all just to get attention and I don't want to hear the opinions and experiences of people who are disrespectful. Why else would she mention it? It's not her place to talk about it. Real friends wouldn't say anything about Phan and everyone else has not enough insight to know the truth. If they are a thing, they only told a very small amount of people they really trust. Don't you think someone would have said something undeniable already if they told more people? Or if there was actual evidence of them hooking up with someone else? But there isn't enough "proof" on either side for outsiders to know anything. Maybe that person thinks she's right or whatever, but that doesn't mean anything. And btw, same goes for videos like that that "confirm" Phan, I'm not just saying this because I ship them!
(if you haven't watched or don't want to just ignore this but some thoughts quickly)
she basically admits that she creeped him out because she was drinking and called him "toasty" several times because she was cold and he was really warm? and talks about that for like a full minute, then right at the end says "by the way, dan and phil, they aren't together" or something along those lines. like, how random and kind of off topic. she didn't even mention phil throughout. just talked about herself and dan meeting. kinda weird imo. idk feel free to disagree, i don't know anything about her so idk what she's like
:biflag: :blackheart:
User avatar
papierklemmen
flower crown
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am

nephilimcat wrote:
papierklemmen wrote: a dose of some "anti", as we've been called :sideeye:, past question, under the cut for safety
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
I haven't watched the video because what I'm thinking is: What makes her think she can just say stuff about Dan and Phil's relationship? When I see videos like this, I never click on them because I'm pretty sure they're all just to get attention and I don't want to hear the opinions and experiences of people who are disrespectful. Why else would she mention it? It's not her place to talk about it. Real friends wouldn't say anything about Phan and everyone else has not enough insight to know the truth. If they are a thing, they only told a very small amount of people they really trust. Don't you think someone would have said something undeniable already if they told more people? Or if there was actual evidence of them hooking up with someone else? But there isn't enough "proof" on either side for outsiders to know anything. Maybe that person thinks she's right or whatever, but that doesn't mean anything. And btw, same goes for videos like that that "confirm" Phan, I'm not just saying this because I ship them!
i don't see anything criminal in what she said... it's not like she went on her channel and released that dan is dating his manager, along with photo evidence. she just made a random comment during her ls and i thought it was curious. i doubt anyone in the youtube community signed NDAs on "please don't reveal that we are NOT dating" i thought that her denial is interesting since among all the denials hers could be the most unbiased. friends&relatives would obviously be on d&p's side of the "cover". no one said it confirms anything!
and by the way, "real friends" have spoken about phan many times, haven't they? some denied, some were vague, some said they don't know.

anyway, we're just having fun here :thumb:
User avatar
eevee
emo goose
Posts: 1183
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 6:26 pm
Location: USA

um, meanwhile:
Image
Phil looks like he went to sleep at 6 AM and is dying inside, Dan glows like he spent the night having orgasms - Ticia
User avatar
lishachi
eclipse shirt
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:08 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: England

kinda off topic but not sure what else to say im waiting for a video soooon



um, im not sure if this is because im still half awake, or i dont understand the context or what he's saying, but at 4:15, phil says "if you didn't live here, this is what our house would look like"
??
is he saying if dan didn't live with him? and "this is what our house would look like? who is our? wat

am i just not getting this feel free to correct me bc i could just be thinking weirdly also ive only had 2 coffees today im not coping very well lol
:biflag: :blackheart:
User avatar
papierklemmen
flower crown
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am

lishachi wrote:kinda off topic but not sure what else to say im waiting for a video soooon



um, im not sure if this is because im still half awake, or i dont understand the context or what he's saying, but at 4:15, phil says "if you didn't live here, this is what our house would look like"
??
is he saying if dan didn't live with him? and "this is what our house would look like? who is our? wat

am i just not getting this feel free to correct me bc i could just be thinking weirdly also ive only had 2 coffees today im not coping very well lol
lol! he means that if dan didn't live with him, he would buy a million plants and the house would look like a jungle, basically. he says it while they are looking at a jungle (or is it a bamboo forest? i looked at it with one eye and already forgot :lol: lmao) picture. edit: just to clarify more: he's still talking about their house, but in case dan wasn't there
User avatar
mysterylovescompany
philussy
Posts: 476
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:56 am

lishachi wrote:kinda off topic but not sure what else to say im waiting for a video soooon



um, im not sure if this is because im still half awake, or i dont understand the context or what he's saying, but at 4:15, phil says "if you didn't live here, this is what our house would look like"
??
is he saying if dan didn't live with him? and "this is what our house would look like? who is our? wat

am i just not getting this feel free to correct me bc i could just be thinking weirdly also ive only had 2 coffees today im not coping very well lol
I think you are overthinking this tbh. It seems like a very offhand comment to me. The house is 'our house', so Phil calls it that it out of habit, even though it sounds strange in this particular sentence. 'If you didn't live here, this is what the house would look like' is another way of saying it. But it is 'our house' to them, so they call it that. Idk if i'm making sense but i hope you understand what i mean lol.
User avatar
Lain
eclipse shirt
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 1:58 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: The Wired

papierklemmen wrote: a dose of some "anti", as we've been called :sideeye:, past question, under the cut for safety
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
There it is, folks. The truth, according to the blushing Dangirl -

(I can only assume, based on how she presents herself in that clip - "I just want to hang out with him and bake him muffins"

"Actually, you know what would be really fun? If you could all tweet at Dan saying he's toasty .. right now. That'll be perfect!")

- that met him once at Playlist in 2013 and called him toasty enough times to weird him out and cause him to casuallynotcasually flee from her presence.

:roll:
Image
corn flakes
moon room
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:26 am

papierklemmen wrote:
dans left hand wrote:
tracyzz wrote:
papierklemmen wrote:oqua,
i stumbled on this while browsing some threads and was wondering why you guys so easily dismissed it as her just being a "dangirl". as far as i know, she was dating charlie mcdonell at the time, would she really have a reason to lie?
How close is her relationship with deppy? We know she just met dan at that point so unless shes close to phil or talked to dan more after that encounter im not sure what lead her to make such a confident conclusion. I do wonder.

I dont believe she is lying. Like you said, i cant think of any reason she would other than if deppy told her to which i dont think so. It might be false, but she certainly believes shes telling the truth.
Why would she know? She was literally just Charlie's girlfriend. Dan wouldn't have told some girl he isn't even close too. He wasn't even that close with Charlie at any point. Just knew him but not close.
it might be that she knew someone else who told her, or that she saw him or phil with someone else (quite likely). we do know there's frisky stuff happening at youtube parties (including "class A drugs" according to that dude whose name i don't remember :lol:)
I think the general consensus wasn't that she was a "dangirl" :sideeye: but that she was barely an acquitance, charlie himself was also one. I'm not saying she is telling lies but she may only think that and if someone told her the "truth" is not someone reliable. She may have seen how they interact and come to her conclusions, she may have seen them hooking up with someone...that's the problem she is not someone close enough or with "evidence".
I do think she is not being mean, she has a right to tell what she seems to think it's the truth, after all this was the time where they denied the rumors. She did this in an old ls, who know if it's true? This is another piece of puzzle both sides of the story can spin to their side.

Houses: I don't think them moving togheter will confirm anything, they already live togheter and like the idea of another person in the house. I also think that phil turning 30yo is not a big deal, while he likes "breeding" he doesn't talk about his future and how a family and kids are included (feel free to tell me the contrary). In this time people settle down when they are older, especially if you are a male, so he doens't have to hurry. Dan seems the one that wants a family but is sensible enough to think he will do once things are right. At the end I don't see them moving to another house, the only way would be because their conctract wasn't renewed, they are in a good place.
English is not my first language: half of the mistakes are typos ,half are me
daphenaxa
blobfish
Posts: 680
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:32 pm
Pronouns: she/her

Lain wrote:
- that met him once at Playlist in 2013 and called him toasty enough times to weird him out and cause him to casuallynotcasually flee from her presence.

:roll:
this actually gives me so many feelings for Dan right now. I can only awwwwww at imagining him fleeing that mess asap while trying to remain casual. I love him so much.

thanks oqua for those beautiful crotch shots and Dan blushing shots, always steering us back to what really matters.
If you’re attracted to somebody, you’ll want them to sniff you eventually - Dan
*Phil is turned on by Dan's brilliance* *they kiss* *they have sex in the microwave* - Oqua (actually Phil)
User avatar
eevee
emo goose
Posts: 1183
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 6:26 pm
Location: USA

Re: Bryarly

As far as I'm concerned, she's just as informed as any other youtuber who's in a different friend group. She wasn't close with dan or phil, I don't know the details inside and out but from what I remember and understand, her little youtube sphere (Charlie, unmentionable british kids in Chameleon Circuit) hardly overlapped with dan and phil, especially not at the time of that video. The chances that she knows dan well enough for him to disclose to her the real honest truth just seems really low to me. She knew enough to wonder, though, which leads me to believe that it's possible she fell down the rabbit hole, which would've led her to find Dan's 2012 breakdown. So she could've just concluded that from that. Or, when she met him, she thought it'd be totally cool as a cucumber to straight up ask him, to which he would definitely say no, because why would he admit phan to some random youtuber hes never met? That one I kinda doubt though because you'd need some serious balls to do that. Anyway I may sound to some of you like I'm bending over backwards to defend phan but I honestly don't think she has any credibility. I'd say the same thing if she were confirming phan.
Image
Phil looks like he went to sleep at 6 AM and is dying inside, Dan glows like he spent the night having orgasms - Ticia
Galactic-Howell
pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:43 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: The Great White North

Re: Bryalrly - I call bullshit. We know for a fact if Deppy are together, they don't spread it around the Youtube community. If they did, they would have been outed long ago. She isn't even close to them, her response was an attention grab from their audience.
Image
Wholesome doggo shitposting through life.
You may also call me Gal!
CallMeAyana
cheeky #spon
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:14 am
Pronouns: Phan Trash
Location: Somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle

[offtopic]Totally OT, but I found something very interesting in my textbook[/offtopic]
3. CREATING LOVE IS A PROCESS
Moving from "I" to "we" requires a shift in perspective and energy. Being an authentic couple is an evolution.
Thoughts? :?

Edit: The topic is about "Ten Rules for Finding Love and Creating Long-lasting Authentic Relationships"

Two-cents: No matter what Deppy's relationship is, we know that they really do love each other- romantically or not.
Image
cold-tea
delia smith
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 3:25 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: Canada

Why would someone they've met once be privy to something that not even deppy's BBC (former?) coworkers don't know of? Also I don't think deppy, the control freaks, would be careless enough to risk being seen in an intimate way with each other/other ppl in a room full of cameras and people who would do anything for their 15 minutes of youtube fame.
User avatar
Catallena
classy cat lady
classy cat lady
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:56 pm
Location: The Netherlands

JoeAverage wrote:(also the tour already ended so that means their levels of stress should have lowered already, why is phil still that thin? I showed my sister a picture of him from the doc that i definitely didnt have as my screensaver nope and she got a bit spooked, I didnt notice how thin he got in the tour cos Im always cheking their content and stuff so I "see" them daily, but since she isnt a hardcore phan she doesnt watch them all the time, so to her the change was drastic (?) idk where im going with this but im just wondering what are u guys thoughts ?)
Yeah Phil was really skinny during the tour, some of his shirts were wearing him instead of the other way around. The shot where he's standing looking at Dan and the woman going through his suitcase is SCARY. Phil has always been slim (I guess he used to have a little belly but whatevz) but that was a bit... It really must've been stress or something because Phil ate more pancakes in those two months than I do in 2 years and despite putting more crap in his body than ever he just stayed like that (I'm lowkey mad tbh). I think he has been putting on some weight again though
akui wrote:
oqua wrote: Also, on the subject of Dan’s face, here is a comparison of his left cheek in 2010 and 2016.
Image
It’s cute to see some of the same freckles.
I just realized how much volume Dan lost on his lips...

Image
Image
As the melanin in his skin left him, he gained white people lips.

btw I have such a thing for 2010-12 Dan's looks and it just gets creepy as I get older help.


Re:Bryarly Like everyone else said she didn't actually know them, and honestly neither did Charlie. He still doesn't really, they're kinda friends and they like each other but that's about it. Charlie is quite anti social these days in general, making me very sad. Anyway, the only reason people paid any attention to her and what she said was because of her relationship and the little taste of internet fame she got because of it. Not because she actually had any relevance or inside info on her own.
Image
Twitter *•.(★).•* Tumblr
User avatar
lilMango
morning quiff
Posts: 470
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:51 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: USA

Galactic-Howell wrote:Re: Bryalrly - I call bullshit. We know for a fact if Deppy are together, they don't spread it around the Youtube community. If they did, they would have been outed long ago. She isn't even close to them, her response was an attention grab from their audience.
I agree that Bryarly probably doesn't know anything, but I think Deppy's relationship has spread around the youtube community, even if they didn't spread it themselves. We would see a lot more videos like this one if absolutely nobody knew. I think it's just a matter of everyone keeping quiet because they know they'd make a lot of enemies if they said anything. It also explains why we see cracks, like from Louise and Cat. (Of course, Louise and Cat are their "friends," but to me they seem more like colleagues than actual friends. That's just me I guess.)
Phil Lester wrote:"I'll rub myself in a mango before I eat a mango."
"Make no judgements where you have no compassion." -Anne McCaffrey
User avatar
eevee
emo goose
Posts: 1183
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 6:26 pm
Location: USA

lilMango wrote:
Galactic-Howell wrote:Re: Bryalrly - I call bullshit. We know for a fact if Deppy are together, they don't spread it around the Youtube community. If they did, they would have been outed long ago. She isn't even close to them, her response was an attention grab from their audience.
I agree that Bryarly probably doesn't know anything, but I think Deppy's relationship has spread around the youtube community, even if they didn't spread it themselves. We would see a lot more videos like this one if absolutely nobody knew. I think it's just a matter of everyone keeping quiet because they know they'd make a lot of enemies if they said anything. It also explains why we see cracks, like from Louise and Cat. (Of course, Louise and Cat are their "friends," but to me they seem more like colleagues than actual friends. That's just me I guess.)
I don't really get what you mean by "we would see a lot more videos like this if no one knew." If no one knew for certain why would more people confirm or deny it? I agree with you that youtubers probably spread gossip just like we do, but I don't think they know for sure. I think they like to think they do, but probably don't really. They probably are in the same position we're in, gossiping about the v day video and old tweets and stuff, but realizing that straight up asking dan and phil or talking about it openly is a no-no. On the contrary from what you said, I think it'd be a lot more likely to see youtubers confirming phan if it was common knowledge. Youtube is a big chain. You can't trust someone to not tell someone to not tell someone who'll tell. Youtubers can be idiots too. And I find it hard to believe that if dan and phil were truly openly out like making out at parties type of out, there wouldn't be at least one person who would think it's acceptable to spill the beans, either for youtube fame, for malice, or watever other reason. So I think it's kind of a don't ask don't tell kind of thing. Like dan and phil just are. There's no definition.
Image
Phil looks like he went to sleep at 6 AM and is dying inside, Dan glows like he spent the night having orgasms - Ticia
User avatar
lilMango
morning quiff
Posts: 470
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:51 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: USA

eevee wrote:
lilMango wrote:
Galactic-Howell wrote:Re: Bryalrly - I call bullshit. We know for a fact if Deppy are together, they don't spread it around the Youtube community. If they did, they would have been outed long ago. She isn't even close to them, her response was an attention grab from their audience.
I agree that Bryarly probably doesn't know anything, but I think Deppy's relationship has spread around the youtube community, even if they didn't spread it themselves. We would see a lot more videos like this one if absolutely nobody knew. I think it's just a matter of everyone keeping quiet because they know they'd make a lot of enemies if they said anything. It also explains why we see cracks, like from Louise and Cat. (Of course, Louise and Cat are their "friends," but to me they seem more like colleagues than actual friends. That's just me I guess.)
I don't really get what you mean by "we would see a lot more videos like this if no one knew." If no one knew for certain why would more people confirm or deny it? I agree with you that youtubers probably spread gossip just like we do, but I don't think they know for sure. I think they like to think they do, but probably don't really. They probably are in the same position we're in, gossiping about the v day video and old tweets and stuff, but realizing that straight up asking dan and phil or talking about it openly is a no-no. On the contrary from what you said, I think it'd be a lot more likely to see youtubers confirming phan if it was common knowledge. Youtube is a big chain. You can't trust someone to not tell someone to not tell someone who'll tell. Youtubers can be idiots too. And I find it hard to believe that if dan and phil were truly openly out like making out at parties type of out, there wouldn't be at least one person who would think it's acceptable to spill the beans, either for youtube fame, for malice, or watever other reason. So I think it's kind of a don't ask don't tell kind of thing. Like dan and phil just are. There's no definition.
If no youtubers knew, the only narrative they would have is the denial narrative. The "oh, those fans are so crazy" narrative. No casual youtuber would really care enough to look into stuff more (except for. like. Emma) but you have a point about not being able to trust every youtuber. I just think they haven't kept stuff completely hidden.
Phil Lester wrote:"I'll rub myself in a mango before I eat a mango."
"Make no judgements where you have no compassion." -Anne McCaffrey
User avatar
eevee
emo goose
Posts: 1183
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 6:26 pm
Location: USA

lilMango wrote: I don't really get what you mean by "we would see a lot more videos like this if no one knew." If no one knew for certain why would more people confirm or deny it? I agree with you that youtubers probably spread gossip just like we do, but I don't think they know for sure. I think they like to think they do, but probably don't really. They probably are in the same position we're in, gossiping about the v day video and old tweets and stuff, but realizing that straight up asking dan and phil or talking about it openly is a no-no. On the contrary from what you said, I think it'd be a lot more likely to see youtubers confirming phan if it was common knowledge. Youtube is a big chain. You can't trust someone to not tell someone to not tell someone who'll tell. Youtubers can be idiots too. And I find it hard to believe that if dan and phil were truly openly out like making out at parties type of out, there wouldn't be at least one person who would think it's acceptable to spill the beans, either for youtube fame, for malice, or watever other reason. So I think it's kind of a don't ask don't tell kind of thing. Like dan and phil just are. There's no definition.
If no youtubers knew, the only narrative they would have is the denial narrative. The "oh, those fans are so crazy" narrative. No casual youtuber would really care enough to look into stuff more (except for. like. Emma) but you have a point about not being able to trust every youtuber. I just think they haven't kept stuff completely hidden.[/quote]

No casual youtuber would care enough? What about Evan? He's a good example. Maybe he's an exception, but think about it this way. In my opinion, the youtuber world is kind of like a high school. There are friend groups, but everyone knows each other or at least knows of each other. There are popular kids and less popular kids. (Translation: smaller youtubers are still allowed at Playlist/Vidcon mixers) In high school, everyone is interested in everyone else's relationships. Where there is a group of people who all know each other, there is bound to be drama. Everyone in high school was interested in who the popular kids dated. When they broke up. When they got together. Why they got together. If they were going to get together. I find it hard to believe that no one in the youtube sphere, especially based on how cliquey it is, cares about other people's relationships. It's human nature.

You could of course argue that youtubers are not high school age and are therefore more mature, which is true, but I think a lot of people here who've been in college or a professional workplace or both can attest to the fact that drama manifests in most if not all groups of people. My waitressing jobs had people of all ages, from 18 to 50, and there was still drama and gossiping. College, which a lot of youtubers are at college age, is a breeding ground for drama. High school was just the easiest parallel to draw, but I honestly think that drama must exist in the youtube sphere.

Not to mention human nature. We are naturally curious. Just look at the phandom. There are millions of people who are extremely curious about dan and phil's relationship. And you think youtubers are immune to this curiosity? You think that just because they happen to have the same job as dan and phil that they don't give a fuck if dan and phil are together? Why? I think it's only the natural conclusion to come to that at least some youtubers must care about if dan and phil are together.

Now to address your point that they only have the negative mentality. Just look at dan and phil. they're attached at the hip. they're exclusive. they're known to choose to spend time together at conventions rather than socialize sometimes. They look at each other lovingly. They know everything about each other. That's really interesting behavior for two people who are just close friends. You don't think that youtubers pick up on that just like we do? why would a youtuber assume they're not dating when we assume they are dating? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that dan and phil have a bit of an unconventional dynamic for best friends. But that's none of my business.

tl;dr I think youtubers gossip just like we do and wouldn't conclude they aren't dating.
Image
Phil looks like he went to sleep at 6 AM and is dying inside, Dan glows like he spent the night having orgasms - Ticia
User avatar
alittledizzy
actual demon phannie
actual demon phannie
Posts: 7106
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:09 pm
Pronouns: she/her

lilMango wrote:If no youtubers knew, the only narrative they would have is the denial narrative. The "oh, those fans are so crazy" narrative. No casual youtuber would really care enough to look into stuff more (except for. like. Emma) but you have a point about not being able to trust every youtuber. I just think they haven't kept stuff completely hidden.
I think I get your point - and if I'm understanding it right, I agree. With no reason to actually suspect anything, most fandoms and m/m fandom ships are just assumed to be total fan fabrication and not taken seriously. There are no whispered rumors about Joe and Caspar really being together amongst professional peers, but we have solid proof that people around Dan and Phil hinted/acted confused/outright stated something was going on in the past and it was not met with amusement or treated casually by Dan and Phil.

I don't think Dan or Phil would have firsthand told many people, but some were in situations of close proximity to Dan and/or Phil for the whole relationship development and others are friends with those people. Even closeted relationships don't exist in a vacuum. Stories get retold, things get around - which would lead to a lot of people feeling like they know but not having heard it from Dan and Phil's own mouths. And unfortunately for Dan and Phil, when some of those people have felt like lashing out they knew how to get Dan and Phil where it hurts.

In general it just leads to a lack in consistency when smaller youtubers (or hell, not even smaller ones, I'd count Tyler Oakley in the 'responds as if there is something to be wary of/hide' category, same with Felix) don't know if they should deny because they think they know best, if they want to deny because they think Dan and Phil will like them more because of it, if they want to hint they know something to get the attention, or if they just shrug and be honest and say they don't know.
majitzu
angel bean
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:22 pm
Location: South America

[offtopic]Completely of topic, but this is my one of my favourite videos, and because is unlisted I'm sure some of you haven't watch it.



[/offtopic]
Image
dans left hand
pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 6:44 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: London, UK

alittledizzy wrote:
lilMango wrote:If no youtubers knew, the only narrative they would have is the denial narrative. The "oh, those fans are so crazy" narrative. No casual youtuber would really care enough to look into stuff more (except for. like. Emma) but you have a point about not being able to trust every youtuber. I just think they haven't kept stuff completely hidden.
I think I get your point - and if I'm understanding it right, I agree. With no reason to actually suspect anything, most fandoms and m/m fandom ships are just assumed to be total fan fabrication and not taken seriously. There are no whispered rumors about Joe and Caspar really being together amongst professional peers, but we have solid proof that people around Dan and Phil hinted/acted confused/outright stated something was going on in the past and it was not met with amusement or treated casually by Dan and Phil.

I don't think Dan or Phil would have firsthand told many people, but some were in situations of close proximity to Dan and/or Phil for the whole relationship development and others are friends with those people. Even closeted relationships don't exist in a vacuum. Stories get retold, things get around - which would lead to a lot of people feeling like they know but not having heard it from Dan and Phil's own mouths. And unfortunately for Dan and Phil, when some of those people have felt like lashing out they knew how to get Dan and Phil where it hurts.

In general it just leads to a lack in consistency when smaller youtubers (or hell, not even smaller ones, I'd count Tyler Oakley in the 'responds as if there is something to be wary of/hide' category, same with Felix) don't know if they should deny because they think they know best, if they want to deny because they think Dan and Phil will like them more because of it, if they want to hint they know something to get the attention, or if they just shrug and be honest and say they don't know.
basically I think back in the day smaller youtubers they were friends with like charlieskies, teoh and Stephen (365days), peej, chris etc.. (god what a throwback some of those are lol)

knew about deppy being together and know now that they are together or were together back in the 2009/2010 era. then they started becoming less sociable with those guys but obviously they would and will still be friendly to them (apart from Charlie, who nearly did out them before wirrow got involved) so they have no reason to out the "phan" right now. I say those guys have the most information on deppy within the whole phan thing, in 2009 anyway.

teoh will not confirm nor deny. I have seen him answer asks on his tumblr about whether deppy are together or were together back in the day.
Locked

Return to “Daniel Howell & Phil Lester”