Haha we are actually there with our ribenas tooWinston wrote:I recognize a few people in the opening photo for the video!
![]()
Hi guys! You know who you are!
Dan & Phil Part 29: Horton hears two b*tch ass liars
- SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
That was a very nice vid, really enjoyed the bants. Nice to spot some familiar faces as well. An hour of my time well spent, I would say.
Friend: I'm coming back home next week but probably won't return for Christmas so you're getting your present early.
Me: That fine I guess, do you even know what I would want though?
Friend: I figured that my present from last year a smash hit so I'm gonna do that again.
Me: ..You got me DAPGO didn't you?
Friend: Yes.
My best friend getting me a book I don't really want for the second year in a row :') #friendshipgoals I mean I like having the damn thing without having to spend money on it, but why can't she buy me Kpop albums hm? At least she stopped sending me Shout magazine articles about them.
All the DAPGO rambling under a spoiler.
Me: That fine I guess, do you even know what I would want though?
Friend: I figured that my present from last year a smash hit so I'm gonna do that again.
Me: ..You got me DAPGO didn't you?
Friend: Yes.
My best friend getting me a book I don't really want for the second year in a row :') #friendshipgoals I mean I like having the damn thing without having to spend money on it, but why can't she buy me Kpop albums hm? At least she stopped sending me Shout magazine articles about them.
All the DAPGO rambling under a spoiler.
-
JoeAverage
- sad dimple
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:23 am
Haven't checked twitter so I'm out of the loop. Did Dan go with Phil already or is he heading out later? And does this mean no Phil ls this Sunday?
Dan is still in London. I hope Phil does a Florida ls, but I expect nothing.JoeAverage wrote:Haven't checked twitter so I'm out of the loop. Did Dan go with Phil already or is he heading out later? And does this mean no Phil ls this Sunday?

-
uglyamerican
- woodland creature
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:26 pm
- Location: Maryland / US
KILL: In my post-Happy Hour state, I grabbed by TABINOF book instead of the DAPGO book, and embarrassed myself. Hiding...
You always have gifsets ready, you must feel attacked a lot around here. Don't worry, you'll come around and accept itCatallena wrote:I've made my dislike for TABINOF and DAPGO quite clear in many posts so you can stop trying to come for me.000dia000 wrote:Catallena wrote: My best friend getting me a book I don't really want for the second year in a row :')
-
JoeAverage
- sad dimple
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:23 am
Hmm i hope Dan isn't too lonely (who am I kidding, those assholes skype daily)majitzu wrote:Dan is still in London. I hope Phil does a Florida ls, but I expect nothing.JoeAverage wrote:Haven't checked twitter so I'm out of the loop. Did Dan go with Phil already or is he heading out later? And does this mean no Phil ls this Sunday?
and yes I hope for a phil ls, but even in the off case we do get it, it's probs going to be 20 min long (though that's better than nothing!) so ! Oh and thanks for answering!!
-
uglyamerican
- woodland creature
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:26 pm
- Location: Maryland / US
OK, so being a full-fledged adult, I don't know how I feel about buying a book published by "Random House Children's Books." I guess I'll have to hide in the closet of shame (for a minute or so...)
Anyway, I like the book, well worth the $12 I paid for it. However, I wished that the book was actually published in a larger format like art/photography/"coffee table" books are usually released. But I understand that the book was largely aimed at the YA market vs. the art book market (and needs to be affordable,) hence the "editing." However, I am interested in the enhanced ebook for the bants.
Anyway, I like the book, well worth the $12 I paid for it. However, I wished that the book was actually published in a larger format like art/photography/"coffee table" books are usually released. But I understand that the book was largely aimed at the YA market vs. the art book market (and needs to be affordable,) hence the "editing." However, I am interested in the enhanced ebook for the bants.
You'll have to do better for me to feel attacked dear, I'm only ever amused and just happen to enjoy reaction gifs when I can be bothered to look for them.000dia000 wrote:You always have gifsets ready, you must feel attacked a lot around here. Don't worry, you'll come around and accept itCatallena wrote:I've made my dislike for TABINOF and DAPGO quite clear in many posts so you can stop trying to come for me.000dia000 wrote:Catallena wrote: My best friend getting me a book I don't really want for the second year in a row :')
Anyway.
#DAPGOOSE video was fun. The part where Dan was all like 'Is that allowed???' about the pic of him giving a squirrel the finger was unintentionally extra funny because of the censorship in the US version of the book. Anyone else notice that at the koala pictures part Dan said 'Kangaroos are so soft' ?
YESSS! I was hesitant to rehash #busgate, but the book vs movie difference really had me in a tizzy yesterday. One could argue that the color of the sheets give something shady away: the brown sheets come with the bus and they'd obviously want to use their own (white/yellow ones), meaning that the scenes filmed on the brown sheets were scripted/planned.000dia000 wrote:akui wrote:
But I think the bigger thing, as pointed out here, is that in the movie Dan was clearly "waking up" in the top bunk, but in the book he's asleep in the middle bunk.....

Who switches beds they've claimed/slept in? No one, that's who.
Couldn't agree with you more! These kinds of pictures are what I live for with Phil. Also, this one just looks more real and I can't quite pinpoint why:Catallena wrote:
-
uglyamerican
- woodland creature
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:26 pm
- Location: Maryland / US
Yea, and I wouldn't call the editing in the US version "censorship." It was likely a groupthink decision by a bunch of careerist mid-level publishing execs advised by overpaid/underworked lawyers about potential liability/backlash by church groups. It's all about the money (and having too many people involved in decisionmaking.)









