Just listening to the audio now, love it, love them, the end.
Edit: Actually not the end. The story of Phil screaming in the face of the delivery guy made me howl!
noodlebum wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:02 pm Did anyone count if they mentioned Stereo 'organically' 10 times?![]()
Just listening to the audio now, love it, love them, the end.
Edit: Actually not the end. The story of Phil screaming in the face of the delivery guy made me howl!
While I understand you not wanting to be disappointed.. I don't think particularly that the choice of words here says anything about it. Me and me girlfriend are currently moving in together, and we've also used the words "collaborating" when we discussed what colour the wall panelling should beLevitating wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:14 pm Yet, I actually perceived more distance between them. Maybe it is due to the chill vibes they emanated, but those words like "collaborating and sharing the space", in the light of Dan's Attitude interview I have recently read, sounded more respectful/professional than those one would use for a partner. Saying something like "this is our house" or "it is also Phil's house" would it make it sound like the reason for comprising derives from the inevitability of having a common space, from having wanted a shared space, something "ours" and not "mine and his". Dan's wording makes me rethink of all those people in London who buy through the share ownership scheme or something like that.
Definitely agree. Designing a place together is the definition of a collaboration and I don't see anything impersonal about using that phrase at all. I still think it's reaching to assume that they're buying the place together to save costs. From even the most modest estimates of their individual net worths, they could comfortably afford to buy a nice apartment in central London each.somelikeitpink wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:41 pmWhile I understand you not wanting to be disappointed.. I don't think particularly that the choice of words here says anything about it. Me and me girlfriend are currently moving in together, and we've also used the words "collaborating" when we discussed what colour the wall panelling should beLevitating wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:14 pm Yet, I actually perceived more distance between them. Maybe it is due to the chill vibes they emanated, but those words like "collaborating and sharing the space", in the light of Dan's Attitude interview I have recently read, sounded more respectful/professional than those one would use for a partner. Saying something like "this is our house" or "it is also Phil's house" would it make it sound like the reason for comprising derives from the inevitability of having a common space, from having wanted a shared space, something "ours" and not "mine and his". Dan's wording makes me rethink of all those people in London who buy through the share ownership scheme or something like that.
Different people may still require a "mine and his" place after moving in together, and I think if you can afford it, it's great to have your own space instead of one big shared everything.
I think that they are both at all times. They are business partners after all as well, and I don't think it's a shame when they lean into one side more than the other at times.
This made me laugh out loudshan wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:14 pm As the saying goes, the simplest solution is usually the correct one. At this point, I think you'd have to be jumping through some serious hoops to come to the conclusion that they aren't together. They have both in the past and present expressed an interest in sex and the idea of having a potential partner come over and saying "do you like the place? I spent three years designing it with my best friend, ex-lover and roommate of ten years who's in that room over there" is so hilarious to me when there's absolutely no reason for them to buy a place, let alone spend literal years designing it, unless they plan on being there together for a long time.

Forget the audio messages, this makes me cringe for real. Didn't they notice Phil was uncomfortable?Imlost wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 10:55 am Hi again!
This liveshow was so lovely, and completely exceeded my expectations. Loving reading all of your thoughts as well, it has been a while since there's been this much going on in the phandom. I can't even pick my favourite moments from the show, all in all the vibe was so great and they really seemed to talk quite freely. There wasn't really anything holding them back.
Surprisingly, I have to say that I kind of disagree about the audio messages. I get second-hand embarrassment very easily, but I thought this show was fine. I mean apart from the one message with just some random voices, the messages were okay in my opinion. No one crossed a line or asked anything awkward. And I think it might be nice for Dan and Phil to actually hear individual voices rather than read a busy chat, where people feel more anonymous/part of the mass. Although I have to admit, I do prefer audience interaction in text form.
Other thing, I noticed on tumblr that people have went to that photo of Phil with "boomer Karen energy" and started to spam the comments with it. I don't really like that, don't think it's funny. For me it seemed like Phil was actually a bit embarrassed about it, and now people are making more jokes about it. Idk, to me it just seems a bit mean, although I know it's not that deep.


snoopysadie wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 4:43 pm
But the way he was putting it, like therapy sessions are spaces where you can figure out stuff about yourself and, I don't know, it had such a positive vibe and it made me think that if Dan thinks about therapy like such a great, healing, pleasant experience. I don't know, it made me smile.
![]()
I joined for the same reason they started the stereo shows to be honest. I lurked for a long time here, and everywhere there was to lurk before it was here (not just dnp stuff all general internet goss lurking). But push come to shove I have been so bored the past few months I needed something to do.somelikeitpink wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 5:21 pm Random note but I was listening to the stereo again while I went running and it really made me realise how... grown up the phan-base has become? Like I always knew that not everyone was a teenager, I wasn’t one either, but I really noticed that with a lot of the voice notes they played. Like you had a teacher and a lawyer and I just thought - hey... people have grown up with them and they’re still here?
Just made me think of dizzy asking me how I felt the fandom had changed since I was last active... it’s grown up.
And I wonder if that’s part of why phil also feels more comfortable being open about things outside the pg-13 topics?

I do love this. I think it's equally people who were teens in phandom literally just being older and partially that older fans might have had a bit more staying power? Whereas it's pretty natural to cycle through interests at a faster clip when you're younger.somelikeitpink wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 5:21 pm Random note but I was listening to the stereo again while I went running and it really made me realise how... grown up the phan-base has become? Like I always knew that not everyone was a teenager, I wasn’t one either, but I really noticed that with a lot of the voice notes they played. Like you had a teacher and a lawyer and I just thought - hey... people have grown up with them and they’re still here?
Just made me think of dizzy asking me how I felt the fandom had changed since I was last active... it’s grown up.
And I wonder if that’s part of why phil also feels more comfortable being open about things outside the pg-13 topics?
One of the most hilarious parts about going to the first tour was hitting up the bar and the ONLY other people ordering drinks were very clearly parents.illiannamontgomery wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 7:42 pm I also have been a long time lurker, like for years. I started watching Phil in 2013 when I had 2 different foot surgeries that required me to be sitting or lying down for 6 months. My son was 4 and LOVED the Crave vidoes so showed me them and I got hooked. I have seen everything and read every blog. I also felt like I may be one of the "old" ones...like a boomer. Lol. I can see now that many of the fans are no longer teenagers and I don't feel weird being in my 30s and loving watch these 2 nerds interact. Be honest though I wanted to go to II but was to scared ppl would think I was someones parent. sigh....regrets...

I’ve just turned 40 and I went to many shows in both tatinof and iI and you know what my advice has always been; do what makes you happy and worry less about what others think. the other good thing about this forum is a lot of us are older so you have no worries at allilliannamontgomery wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 7:42 pm I also have been a long time lurker, like for years. I started watching Phil in 2013 when I had 2 different foot surgeries that required me to be sitting or lying down for 6 months. My son was 4 and LOVED the Crave vidoes so showed me them and I got hooked. I have seen everything and read every blog. I also felt like I may be one of the "old" ones...like a boomer. Lol. I can see now that many of the fans are no longer teenagers and I don't feel weird being in my 30s and loving watch these 2 nerds interact. Be honest though I wanted to go to II but was to scared ppl would think I was someones parent. sigh....regrets...
I feel called outkavat wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 8:03 pm One of my favorite things about IDB is when people chime in with their very specific knowledge in things slightly relevant to dnp. Please continue to talk about marketing and podcasting and accounting and whatever else comes up.

Oh hey same! I started watching them around Dilmas of 2018 (and I had much better things to catch up on than the Sims videos..) so these past few videos/Stereos are the first *real* joint content I've been here for as it happens. It's been so overwhelming after being a two-year phannie in a time where hearing the word 'we' in a Phil video or disembodied voice in an insta story is something to get excited overLAshleigh wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:02 am Also, I just finished Tuesday's stream and there's another coming in less than 24 hours. As someone who joined the phandom at the tail end of 2018, I am not used to keeping up with this much content!!
okay it's giving slightly less of a heart attack knowing that there's at least SOME moderation. but...yeah...that random sound was wild. like...????fruitcriminals wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:46 pmFirst they break stereo, then they break the moderators lol! I can just imagine someone sitting in a tiny cubicle somewhere overseas with messages blasting at them through a headset whilst they cry and google what a lady door is to work out if it's offensive.alittledizzy wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:41 pmI genuinely don't understand how that was moderated and some of those still got through. You can see the activity in a show and they played 17 messages, but received 8468 messages. In that almost EIGHT AND A HALF THOUSAND other messages they couldn't find one that wasn't random noises? Wild.fruitcriminals wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:25 pm I've listened to other youtubers on stereo who have straight up said they're being moderated, and the stereo website says "We have a team of moderators who ensure Stereo Shows are free from hate speech and offensive content." So I am assuming stereo need to be assigned better moderators to not only edit out the offensive and weird messages, to also get rid of the cringe?
There were also 16,257 listeners throughout and the it peaked at 10,790 listeners at one time.
lol i'm 40 and a teacher. last year (pre-covid teaching from home) i had a dnp poster in my office (the one from the ii dvd). colleagues would be like "what's that?" and i'd be like, "oh, haha, they are youtube comedians and they make me happy" and that was that. no big deal.onemoresock wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 10:06 pm I too have been lurking everywhere on and off for years and years (i think i found dan in 2012?). I am 31 next month and so I remember when tatinof happened i had absolutely no desire to go to the show out of misguided fear that I’d be one of the oldest there. When ii happened, i was much less concerned about being in my late 20s, because by that point i think i’d realised that dnp’s audience ran the gamut of ages - and beyond that, it really didn’t matter! having said that, i still didn’t go because i didn’t think it would be as fun to do without a friend and i didn’t know anyone who watched dnp. i regret it a little, i think, although i would have more so if not for the hard work of idb and also the ability to buy the show!!
i will admit also that when i bought tabinof, i had it delivered to my workplace and then told my boss that it was for my godson. i think these days i have a lot less embarrassment over the things that bring me joy, luckily.
and oh boy do they still bring me immeasurable joyi’m still in delighted shock that we have another stereo show tomorrow.