Re: Dan & Phil Part 12: Stalking him until he loves you
Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 3:03 pm
@Spider love the phan analysis, this is what I live for. I agree that it was a phan moment but that's just because I have major phan goggles
I hope not D:gnostic wrote:Wasn't there a ls where Dan essentially said there will be no more earrings? People on GG speculated he wanted to clean up his image, too
I showed it to my mom who is unaware of Phan and she thought that it was a cute boyfriend moment. Not that it says much because 90% of people who have no idea who they are think they're a couple. Which is kinda interesting imo, I generally don't look at two men together and think "WOW SO GAY ASDJFJDKJSKJH"eevee wrote:@Spider love the phan analysis, this is what I live for. I agree that it was a phan moment but that's just because I have major phan goggles
I think the fringes and the general look of them just makes them look gay to our parents lolWhatevenismyusername wrote:I showed it to my mom who is unaware of Phan and she thought that it was a cute boyfriend moment. Not that it says much because 90% of people who have no idea who they are think they're a couple. Which is kinda interesting imo, I generally don't look at two men together and think "WOW SO GAY ASDJFJDKJSKJH"eevee wrote:@Spider love the phan analysis, this is what I live for. I agree that it was a phan moment but that's just because I have major phan goggles
I mean, my brother ask me if they were together the first time he saw them and he has never watched a video of them beforeeevee wrote:I think the fringes and the general look of them just makes them look gay to our parents lolWhatevenismyusername wrote:I showed it to my mom who is unaware of Phan and she thought that it was a cute boyfriend moment. Not that it says much because 90% of people who have no idea who they are think they're a couple. Which is kinda interesting imo, I generally don't look at two men together and think "WOW SO GAY ASDJFJDKJSKJH"eevee wrote:@Spider love the phan analysis, this is what I live for. I agree that it was a phan moment but that's just because I have major phan goggles
i was actually thinking of showing a video of to a very close gay friend of mine to see if he and how he will comment on the nature of their relationship based on their interactions but i cannot decide which video of deppy would be the best to show... any ideas??Whatevenismyusername wrote:I showed it to my mom who is unaware of Phan and she thought that it was a cute boyfriend moment. Not that it says much because 90% of people who have no idea who they are think they're a couple. Which is kinda interesting imo, I generally don't look at two men together and think "WOW SO GAY ASDJFJDKJSKJH"eevee wrote:@Spider love the phan analysis, this is what I live for. I agree that it was a phan moment but that's just because I have major phan goggles
That's true if you ignore the fact that Canada is right above the US, but they went all the way across the US and all the main Canadian tour cities are very close to the US border, so they really just need to go north a bit every once and a while in their tour. They've done longer distances between two US cities than it'd be to include more Canada dates.hiddenwombat wrote:to be fair i do understand why they only did toronto they were road tripping the whole thing and canada (like australia!) is huuuuge. pray for us. hold mestarlight-still wrote: Australian phans, I know you don't want to get your hopes up but I cannot imagine that they'd leave you guys out of a world tour if they do one. I'm hopeful for you I mean they better not diss you like they did half of Canada come on now
That's from the christmas interactive adventure or whatever.Anonymousse wrote:[offtopic]Why haven't I seen this, and Phil you really are weird at video making...
what happened =([/offtopic]
It's from one of his "multiple choices" video, isn't it ? You can also end up with this videoAnonymousse wrote:[offtopic]Why haven't I seen this, and Phil you really are weird at video making...
what happened =(
[/offtopic]
It reminds me of certain individuals...mmm...it's on the tip of my tongue...aralik wrote:
also kinda relating to the topic or not but whatever i found it funny:
Good lord why have I never seen this?NarrysCanary wrote: It's from one of his "multiple choices" video, isn't it ? You can also end up with this video
which kills me everytime
edit : the thumbnail is not attractive at all though
I'm upset that Taylor Swift is grouped in with the teeny bopper YT stars ): But that's life, just like the fact that D&P are in there...oh wells.Ticia wrote: And now...WOWZA 2.0:
Phil has a lot of unlisted videos, this one is one of my favourites :Whatevenismyusername wrote:Good lord why have I never seen this?NarrysCanary wrote: It's from one of his "multiple choices" video, isn't it ? You can also end up with this video
which kills me everytime
edit : the thumbnail is not attractive at all though
To be fair, Hometown are singers too.I can't believe I know about themeevee wrote:I'm upset that Taylor Swift is grouped in with the teeny bopper YT stars ): But that's life, just like the fact that D&P are in there...oh wells.Ticia wrote: And now...WOWZA 2.0:
IKR ! I thought the same the first time I saw itWinston wrote:Omg that thumbnail tho... it looks very inappropriate if you don't know what it is.![]()
aralik wrote:i was actually thinking of showing a video of to a very close gay friend of mine to see if he and how he will comment on the nature of their relationship based on their interactions but i cannot decide which video of deppy would be the best to show... any ideas??Whatevenismyusername wrote:I showed it to my mom who is unaware of Phan and she thought that it was a cute boyfriend moment. Not that it says much because 90% of people who have no idea who they are think they're a couple. Which is kinda interesting imo, I generally don't look at two men together and think "WOW SO GAY ASDJFJDKJSKJH"eevee wrote:@Spider love the phan analysis, this is what I live for. I agree that it was a phan moment but that's just because I have major phan goggles
also kinda relating to the topic or not but whatever i found it funny:
I don't know what I expected but wow, I mean no kink-shaming ofc but seriously what??Rigby wrote:[offtopic]There's an article about Dan in The Guardian not really, sorry
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radi ... ve-as-dogs
"While the pup community is a broad church, human pups tend to be male, gay, have an interest in dressing in leather, wear dog-like hoods, enjoy tactile interactions like stomach rubbing or ear tickling, play with toys, eat out of bowls and are often in a relationship with their human 'handlers'".[/offtopic]
I don't mean to kink shame either buttttttbluebox-away wrote:I don't know what I expected but wow, I mean no kink-shaming ofc but seriously what??Rigby wrote:[offtopic]There's an article about Dan in The Guardian not really, sorry
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radi ... ve-as-dogs
"While the pup community is a broad church, human pups tend to be male, gay, have an interest in dressing in leather, wear dog-like hoods, enjoy tactile interactions like stomach rubbing or ear tickling, play with toys, eat out of bowls and are often in a relationship with their human 'handlers'".[/offtopic]
Also thanks spider for that great bit of analysis, quality content as per usual