i liked the new video, still! the ending gave me beautiful flashbacks to the easter baking although i don't understand why this would be phil's go-to reaction to someone trying to feed him.
thank you!Philena wrote:And lurker
thank you!Philena wrote:And lurker
Is losing 800 some subs unusual? I unsubscribe to people all the time.oribanana wrote:Has anyone been paying attention to the Youtube Glitch? Seems like a lot of Youtubers are losing subscribers. Felix is losing hundreds of subscribers every 2 seconds, yikes. But it seems it's only affected Dan and not Phil/gaming channel. Dan had like 6,268,894 and now he's down to 6,268,025

Phil seems to react as though he's expecting Dan to do something other than just feed him - which makes me wonder if there are unused takes from videos or just actual moments from real life where Dan trolls him like that, leans in close under the guise of feeding and then does something else. (Poke, tickle, kiss idk, insert whatever your phan-belief interaction level would consider realistic.)lurker wrote:i liked the new video, still! the ending gave me beautiful flashbacks to the easter baking although i don't understand why this would be phil's go-to reaction to someone trying to feed him.![]()
in the ls from november when dan said "close your eyes" phil replied with "i don't wanna close my eyes! you're gonna put something else..!". literally don't wanna know(c)alittledizzy wrote:Phil seems to react as though he's expecting Dan to do something other than just feed him - which makes me wonder if there are unused takes from videos or just actual moments from real life where Dan trolls him like that, leans in close under the guise of feeding and then does something else. (Poke, tickle, kiss idk, insert whatever your phan-belief interaction level would consider realistic.)lurker wrote:i liked the new video, still! the ending gave me beautiful flashbacks to the easter baking although i don't understand why this would be phil's go-to reaction to someone trying to feed him.![]()
From what I've read if someone clicks unsub it's taking two off the accounts subscriber count meaning trolls are having a field day clicking sub and unsub to the same account for hours to watch the numbers go down.oribanana wrote:Has anyone been paying attention to the Youtube Glitch? Seems like a lot of Youtubers are losing subscribers. Felix is losing hundreds of subscribers every 2 seconds, yikes. But it seems it's only affected Dan and not Phil/gaming channel. Dan had like 6,268,894 and now he's down to 6,268,025

I feel like that's actually the point a lot of people were trying to make, and the whole debate ends up being a miscommunication where someone says "I don't enjoy Dan's sense of humor being so harsh" and all other people hear "I think Dan being mean hurts Phil."gnostic wrote:I didn't exactly participate in the mean Dan discussion but I did agree with it for some extent. The point is, I KNOW Dan is joking and / or exaggerating for the sake of video and Phil is completely fine with it and also a bloody adult who can shut Dan up if he gets uncomfortable
It's just unpleasant to me as a viewer to watch some particularly excessive examples of Dan being overly mean, unfair, smug or aggressive in context of friendly bantz.

^^^ I'd like to know what Phil struggled to say there at 8:54. Sounded like a "Well you" gone wrong, to me. As in "Well, you would suggest bondage."Amiaw wrote: Also: Phil looked flustered and then intrigued when Dan brought up bondage
yeah i agree with this. i thought the quick draw video was funny and i did enjoy it, but at the same time, it made me uncomfortable hearing dan be so critical. which, before someone says something, i know he was joking and i don't think phil was offended, but i'm just saying that, as a viewer, it did upset me hearing that type of thing. (and also i don't think dan normally is like this, i only really noticed it in the quick draw video for recent gaming videos).alittledizzy wrote:I feel like that's actually the point a lot of people were trying to make, and the whole debate ends up being a miscommunication where someone says "I don't enjoy Dan's sense of humor being so harsh" and all other people hear "I think Dan being mean hurts Phil."gnostic wrote:I didn't exactly participate in the mean Dan discussion but I did agree with it for some extent. The point is, I KNOW Dan is joking and / or exaggerating for the sake of video and Phil is completely fine with it and also a bloody adult who can shut Dan up if he gets uncomfortable
It's just unpleasant to me as a viewer to watch some particularly excessive examples of Dan being overly mean, unfair, smug or aggressive in context of friendly bantz.
Of course, I'm sure there are people who thought Dan was being mean to Phil and it hurt Phil, and those are the people Dan was addressing. But on here I felt like I saw more people just commenting on not always liking Dan's humor. Phil is obviously not bothered by the ~bantz but I definitely still feel like it's the right of the people watching as viewers to not like or not like that humor, no matter what Phil thinks of it. (Just like some people don't like Dan screaming, or Phil feigning ignorance about innuendo.)
I don't think that's normal? I think Glastonbury Festival which had really big acts like Muse headlining was about £200 (ca. $320 for comparison) for five days of camping and music. You don't get to meet any of the acts there of course but anyway. That's a lot of money for a one day festival and the only big star they have in their line-up is Lindsey Sterling. I think the admission prices are okay because I guess they include watching the acts perform but it is only one day and having to pay so much money to meet the acts seems kind of ridiculous to me. Celebrities charging so much money for a hug and a photo always make me uncomfortable to be honest but I know this is Amplify's doing. I still wonder why Deppy agreed to perform there. The more I find out about this festival, the weirder I think it is.basictrashfan wrote:A general admission ticket that only lets you into the venue, so no perks is $65 for early release, $75 for second release. Then a meet and greet for an unknown amount of time is an extra $189 on top of the GA tickets. That's only for one person, so if you wanted to meet both Dan and Phil and Lindsey Stirling for example, you would have to pay $65 for your general admission, $189 for Lindsey and then another $189 for Dan and Phil. But say you wanted to meet all the talent, both headlining and not headlining it's $450, still not including the admission price. (and there's only 50 of these available)
For an event like this is this normal? Because for the age group that they seem to be marketing this towards, generally teens, this would be a lot of money if you wanted to meet everyone and go to the festival.
That's exactly what I was thinking, there's really not value for money in these tickets. And I also just noticed that there is a +fees attached to all of the prices, which I assume is a handling fee , booking fee or something of the sort which is quite common, but does increase the price. I feel like the organisers didn't really take into consideration the people who would be buying these tickets and their means of paying for them.Birdie wrote:I don't think that's normal? I think Glastonbury Festival which had really big acts like Muse headlining was about £200 (ca. $320 for comparison) for five days of camping and music. You don't get to meet any of the acts there of course but anyway. That's a lot of money for a one day festival and the only big star they have in their line-up is Lindsey Sterling. I think the admission prices are okay because I guess they include watching the acts perform but it is only one day and having to pay so much money to meet the acts seems kind of ridiculous to me. Celebrities charging so much money for a hug and a photo always make me uncomfortable to be honest but I know this is Amplify's doing. I still wonder why Deppy agreed to perform there. The more I find out about this festival, the weirder I think it is.basictrashfan wrote:A general admission ticket that only lets you into the venue, so no perks is $65 for early release, $75 for second release. Then a meet and greet for an unknown amount of time is an extra $189 on top of the GA tickets. That's only for one person, so if you wanted to meet both Dan and Phil and Lindsey Stirling for example, you would have to pay $65 for your general admission, $189 for Lindsey and then another $189 for Dan and Phil. But say you wanted to meet all the talent, both headlining and not headlining it's $450, still not including the admission price. (and there's only 50 of these available)
For an event like this is this normal? Because for the age group that they seem to be marketing this towards, generally teens, this would be a lot of money if you wanted to meet everyone and go to the festival.
Yeah it's really strange. It's not part of the normal Amplify Live thing and Deppy also haven't mentioned anything about it and also why the fuck is Nash Grier also in the lineup...Birdie wrote:I don't think that's normal? I think Glastonbury Festival which had really big acts like Muse headlining was about £200 (ca. $320 for comparison) for five days of camping and music. You don't get to meet any of the acts there of course but anyway. That's a lot of money for a one day festival and the only big star they have in their line-up is Lindsey Sterling. I think the admission prices are okay because I guess they include watching the acts perform but it is only one day and having to pay so much money to meet the acts seems kind of ridiculous to me. Celebrities charging so much money for a hug and a photo always make me uncomfortable to be honest but I know this is Amplify's doing. I still wonder why Deppy agreed to perform there. The more I find out about this festival, the weirder I think it is.basictrashfan wrote:A general admission ticket that only lets you into the venue, so no perks is $65 for early release, $75 for second release. Then a meet and greet for an unknown amount of time is an extra $189 on top of the GA tickets. That's only for one person, so if you wanted to meet both Dan and Phil and Lindsey Stirling for example, you would have to pay $65 for your general admission, $189 for Lindsey and then another $189 for Dan and Phil. But say you wanted to meet all the talent, both headlining and not headlining it's $450, still not including the admission price. (and there's only 50 of these available)
For an event like this is this normal? Because for the age group that they seem to be marketing this towards, generally teens, this would be a lot of money if you wanted to meet everyone and go to the festival.